Samsung Australia ordered to pay $9.7 million for deceptive advertisements


Samsung Australia has been ordered by the Federal Courtroom to pay a $14 million (about $9.7 million USD) high quality for a deceptive advertising marketing campaign, as noticed by PhoneArena. The advertisements in query recommended that a few of its water resistant telephones might be utilized in swimming pools and at seashores, which Samsung’s personal web site advises in opposition to.

The advertisements ran between March 2016 and October 2018, depicting Galaxy A-series, S7-series, and S8-series telephones. They’re all rated IP68, which suggests you’ll be able to absolutely submerge them in water for an prolonged period of time — on this case, as much as half-hour to a depth of 1.5 meters (about 5 ft). However that safety solely extends to freshwater — saltwater and chlorinated pool water are a unique matter.

Samsung’s advertisements implied that it’s okay to take your telephone browsing. It isn’t advisable to take your telephone browsing.
Picture: Australian Competitors and Client Fee / Samsung Australia

The Australian Competitors and Client Fee (or ACCC) took Samsung Australia to job on these claims in 2019, and the Federal Courtroom is ordering Samsung to pay up. The ACCC’s chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb says that the group reviewed tons of of complaints from Galaxy homeowners who say their telephones malfunctioned or stopped working altogether after being uncovered to water. The weak hyperlink appears to be the charging port: if the telephone is utilized in saltwater or chlorinated water after which charged earlier than the port is completely dry, corrosion can happen.

It’s all reminder that even a robust waterproof score like IP68 comes with sure limitations. Finest to err on the aspect of warning earlier than you imagine one thing you see on TV and take a swim along with your smartphone.



Supply hyperlink

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published.